Film-style poster for the Program Goals and Measures presentation

Program Goals and Measures Program Goals and Measures

How to set a program’s goals and the measures that show it is working.

What this presentation covers

What this presentation covers

What this presentation covers

Start from a theory of change

Write down the change you want

MENTOR asks every program for a theory of change: how mentoring leads to results.

  • Inputs mentors, staff, time
  • Outputs matches made, meetings held
  • Short-term outcomes skills, confidence, network
  • Long-term outcomes retention, promotion

The four levels of evaluation

Measure on four levels, not one

Kirkpatrick’s model runs from how people react to the results that follow.

  • Reaction was it useful?
  • Learning what did they gain?
  • Behaviour what do they do differently?
  • Results what changed for the organisation?

Measuring more than satisfaction

Ask about usefulness, not only enjoyment

In 34 training studies, usefulness ratings tracked use on the job better than liking did.

  • Did you enjoy it? a weaker link to use on the job
  • Was it useful to you? a stronger link to use on the job

How often pairs meet

Count meetings: they are the first sign

Across 173 samples, meeting more often went with more psychosocial support.

ρ = .25 meeting frequency and psychosocial support Eby et al., 2013
40,737 mentees in 173 samples Eby et al., 2013

Logging every meeting

Log each meeting the same way

The standard asks for each meeting’s date, length and activity, plus regular check-ins.

  • Date day of the meeting
  • Length in minutes
  • Activity what the pair worked on
  • Check-in twice in month one, then monthly

Define each measure

Define every measure before launch

Write each formula, source and target down, so every report counts the same way.

  • Participation active pairs ÷ matched pairs
  • Meeting rate meetings per pair per month
  • Satisfaction average rating, 1 to 5
  • Retention still here ÷ started, at 12 months

Leading and lagging measures

Watch early signs, report later results

Meetings and relationship quality show within weeks, retention and promotion take years.

  • Leading sign-ups, meetings, relationship quality
  • Lagging retention, promotion, skills in use

Measuring retention

Retention shows up years later

Among over 1,000 Army officers, mentoring went with less actual turnover ten years on.

Career outcomes like pay

Keep targets for pay modest

A meta-analysis found mentoring helps careers, but effects on objective outcomes were small.

  • Objective pay: small effects
  • Subjective career satisfaction

Taking a baseline

Take a baseline before the first match

A youth mentoring trial surveyed both groups at baseline and again 18 months later.

  • The same survey before and after
  • A comparison group when you can
  • Records you already keep, like retention
  • A fixed date for the follow-up

Sources

The research behind this presentation

  1. MENTOR: The National Mentoring Partnership (2015) Elements of Effective Practice for Mentoring, Fourth Edition MENTOR, Boston
  2. Kirkpatrick, D. L. & Kirkpatrick, J. D. (2006) Evaluating Training Programs: The Four Levels (3rd ed.) Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco
  3. Alliger, G. M., Tannenbaum, S. I., Bennett, W., Traver, H. & Shotland, A. (1997) A meta-analysis of the relations among training criteria Personnel Psychology, 50(2), 341-358
  4. Eby, L. T., Allen, T. D., Hoffman, B. J., Baranik, L. E., Sauer, J. B., Baldwin, S., Morrison, M. A., Kinkade, K. M., Maher, C. P., Curtis, S. & Evans, S. C. (2013) An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring Psychological Bulletin, 139(2), 441-476
  5. Payne, S. C. & Huffman, A. H. (2005) A longitudinal examination of the influence of mentoring on organizational commitment and turnover Academy of Management Journal, 48(1), 158-168
  6. Allen, T. D., Eby, L. T., Poteet, M. L., Lentz, E. & Lima, L. (2004) Career benefits associated with mentoring for protégés: A meta-analysis Journal of Applied Psychology, 89(1), 127-136
  7. Grossman, J. B. & Rhodes, J. E. (2002) The test of time: Predictors and effects of duration in youth mentoring relationships American Journal of Community Psychology, 30(2), 199-219

Choose few measures and fix them early

Set the goal, the baseline and the target before the first pair meets.

Open your admin panel Sign in All presentations